<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ancient Tablet Proves Jesus Wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from Plymouth Brethren Blogger Rey Reynoso</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop</title>
		<link>http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Though there is a dissenting voice as well:

The Rabbins consequently suppose the prophecy to refer either to the three captivities, the Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Roman, which has not ended yet; or to the three periods of the temple of Solomon, of that of Zerubbabel, and of the one to be erected by the Messiah. Many of the fathers, on the other hand, and many of the early Lutheran commentators, have found in them a prediction of the death of Christ and His resurrection on the third day. Compare, for example, &lt;i&gt;Calovii Bibl. illustr. ad h. l.&lt;/i&gt;, where this allusion is defended by a long series of undeniably weak arguments, and where a fierce attack is made, not only upon Calvin, who understood these words as &quot;referring to the liberation of Israel from captivity, and the restoration of the church after two days, i.e., in a very short time;&quot; but also upon Grotius, who found, in addition to the immediate historical allusion to the Israelites, whom God would soon liberate from their death-like misery after their conversion, a foretype, in consequence of a special divine indication, of the time &quot;within which Christ would recover His life, and the church its hope.&quot; But any direct allusion in the hope here uttered to the death and resurrection of Christ, is proved to be untenable by the simple words and their context. The words primarily hold out nothing more than the quickening of Israel out of its death-like state of rejection from the face of God, and that in a very short period after its conversion to the Lord.
-from &lt;i&gt;Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though there is a dissenting voice as well:</p>
<p>The Rabbins consequently suppose the prophecy to refer either to the three captivities, the Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Roman, which has not ended yet; or to the three periods of the temple of Solomon, of that of Zerubbabel, and of the one to be erected by the Messiah. Many of the fathers, on the other hand, and many of the early Lutheran commentators, have found in them a prediction of the death of Christ and His resurrection on the third day. Compare, for example, &lt;i&gt;Calovii Bibl. illustr. ad h. l.&lt;/i&gt;, where this allusion is defended by a long series of undeniably weak arguments, and where a fierce attack is made, not only upon Calvin, who understood these words as &quot;referring to the liberation of Israel from captivity, and the restoration of the church after two days, i.e., in a very short time;&quot; but also upon Grotius, who found, in addition to the immediate historical allusion to the Israelites, whom God would soon liberate from their death-like misery after their conversion, a foretype, in consequence of a special divine indication, of the time &quot;within which Christ would recover His life, and the church its hope.&quot; But any direct allusion in the hope here uttered to the death and resurrection of Christ, is proved to be untenable by the simple words and their context. The words primarily hold out nothing more than the quickening of Israel out of its death-like state of rejection from the face of God, and that in a very short period after its conversion to the Lord.<br />
-from &lt;i&gt;Keil &amp; Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament&lt;/i&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop</title>
		<link>http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>The Resurrection of Christ, and our resurrection in Him and in His Resurrection, could not be more plainly foretold. The prophet expressly mentions &quot;two days,&quot; after which life should be given, and a &quot;third day, on&quot; which the resurrection should take place. What else can this be than the two days in which the Body of Christ lay in the tomb, and the third day, on which He rose again, as &quot;the Resurrection and the life&quot; Joh_11:25, &quot;the first fruits of them that slept&quot; 1Co_15:20, the source and earnest and pledge of our resurrection and of life eternal?
-&lt;i&gt;Adam Clarke&#039;s Commentary on the Bible&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Resurrection of Christ, and our resurrection in Him and in His Resurrection, could not be more plainly foretold. The prophet expressly mentions &quot;two days,&quot; after which life should be given, and a &quot;third day, on&quot; which the resurrection should take place. What else can this be than the two days in which the Body of Christ lay in the tomb, and the third day, on which He rose again, as &quot;the Resurrection and the life&quot; Joh_11:25, &quot;the first fruits of them that slept&quot; 1Co_15:20, the source and earnest and pledge of our resurrection and of life eternal?<br />
-&lt;i&gt;Adam Clarke&#8217;s Commentary on the Bible&lt;/i&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop</title>
		<link>http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Primarily, in type, Israel&#039;s national revival, &lt;i&gt;in a short period&lt;/i&gt; (&quot;&lt;i&gt;two or three&quot;&lt;/i&gt; being used to denote a &lt;i&gt;few&lt;/i&gt; days, Isa 17:6; Luk 13:32, Luk 13:33); antitypically the language is so framed as to refer in its &lt;i&gt;full accuracy&lt;/i&gt; only to Messiah, the ideal Israel (Isa 49:3; compare Mat 2:15, with Hos 11:1), raised on the third day (Joh 2:19; 1Co 15:4; compare Isa 53:10).
-from &lt;i&gt;Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary&lt;/i&gt; (italic emphasis in original)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primarily, in type, Israel&#8217;s national revival, &lt;i&gt;in a short period&lt;/i&gt; (&quot;&lt;i&gt;two or three&quot;&lt;/i&gt; being used to denote a &lt;i&gt;few&lt;/i&gt; days, <a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Isa+17%3A6" title="Bible Gateway">Isa 17:6</a>; <a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Luk+13%3A32" title="Bible Gateway">Luk 13:32</a>, <a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Luk+13%3A33" title="Bible Gateway">Luk 13:33</a>); antitypically the language is so framed as to refer in its &lt;i&gt;full accuracy&lt;/i&gt; only to Messiah, the ideal Israel (<a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Isa+49%3A3" title="Bible Gateway">Isa 49:3</a>; compare <a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Mat+2%3A15" title="Bible Gateway">Mat 2:15</a>, with <a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Hos+11%3A1" title="Bible Gateway">Hos 11:1</a>), raised on the third day (Joh 2:19; 1Co 15:4; compare <a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Isa+53%3A10" title="Bible Gateway">Isa 53:10</a>).<br />
-from &lt;i&gt;Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary&lt;/i&gt; (italic emphasis in original)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop</title>
		<link>http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>But this seems to have a further reference to the resurrection of Jesus Christ; and the time limited is expressed by &lt;i&gt;two days&lt;/i&gt; and the &lt;i&gt;third day,&lt;/i&gt; that it may be a type and figure of Christ&#039;s rising the &lt;i&gt;third day,&lt;/i&gt; which he is said to do &lt;i&gt;according to the scriptures,&lt;/i&gt; according to this scripture; for all the prophets testified of &lt;i&gt;the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow.&lt;/i&gt; Let us see and admire the wisdom and goodness of God, in ordering the prophet&#039;s words so that when he foretold the deliverance of the church out of her troubles he should at the same time point out our salvation by Christ, which other salvations were both figures and fruits of; and, though they might not be aware of this mystery in the words, yet now that they are fulfilled in the letter of them in the resurrection of Christ it is a confirmation to our faith that &lt;i&gt;this is he that should come,&lt;/i&gt; and we are to &lt;i&gt;look for no other.&lt;/i&gt;
-from &lt;i&gt;Matthew Henry&#039;s Commentary on the Whole Bible&lt;/i&gt; (italic emphasis in original)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this seems to have a further reference to the resurrection of Jesus Christ; and the time limited is expressed by &lt;i&gt;two days&lt;/i&gt; and the &lt;i&gt;third day,&lt;/i&gt; that it may be a type and figure of Christ&#8217;s rising the &lt;i&gt;third day,&lt;/i&gt; which he is said to do &lt;i&gt;according to the scriptures,&lt;/i&gt; according to this scripture; for all the prophets testified of &lt;i&gt;the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow.&lt;/i&gt; Let us see and admire the wisdom and goodness of God, in ordering the prophet&#8217;s words so that when he foretold the deliverance of the church out of her troubles he should at the same time point out our salvation by Christ, which other salvations were both figures and fruits of; and, though they might not be aware of this mystery in the words, yet now that they are fulfilled in the letter of them in the resurrection of Christ it is a confirmation to our faith that &lt;i&gt;this is he that should come,&lt;/i&gt; and we are to &lt;i&gt;look for no other.&lt;/i&gt;<br />
-from &lt;i&gt;Matthew Henry&#8217;s Commentary on the Whole Bible&lt;/i&gt; (italic emphasis in original)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop</title>
		<link>http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblearchive.com/blog/2008/apologetics/ancient-tablet-proves-jesus-wrong/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d think this would be called out as a prooftext, but it&#039;s more the commentaries on these verses that I found interesting. The more I look around through Christian academia (and the older theological commentaries), the more I find that suggests this whole concept of a Jewish death/resurrection &lt;i&gt;motif&lt;/i&gt;-since the Jews don&#039;t accept the Jesus/Jonah connection so far as I understand it-prior to the New Testament period is not all that unknown or uncommon. In short, this whole (so-called) controversy is more a matter of some people not doing their homework rather than really any &quot;new&quot; information coming to light.
&quot;Hos 6.1-2&quot;Come, let us return to the LORD; for he has torn us, that he may heal us; he has struck us down, and he will bind us up. After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d think this would be called out as a prooftext, but it&#8217;s more the commentaries on these verses that I found interesting. The more I look around through Christian academia (and the older theological commentaries), the more I find that suggests this whole concept of a Jewish death/resurrection &lt;i&gt;motif&lt;/i&gt;-since the Jews don&#8217;t accept the Jesus/Jonah connection so far as I understand it-prior to the New Testament period is not all that unknown or uncommon. In short, this whole (so-called) controversy is more a matter of some people not doing their homework rather than really any &quot;new&quot; information coming to light.<br />
&quot;<a class="scripturizer"  href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=NASB&amp;passage=Hos+6" title="Bible Gateway">Hos 6</a>.1-2&quot;Come, let us return to the LORD; for he has torn us, that he may heal us; he has struck us down, and he will bind us up. After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

