Posts Tagged ‘romans’
10 November
Posted by rey
Way back I noted that words are important but especially within their context; they are intended to communicate immediate meaning to the reader. Literary methods are also used as vehicles for this meaning: markers that unite ideas (structure) are accentuated with repetition (patterns) and are all used for carrying through the overall idea (the flow of thought).
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: dispensationalism, hermeneutics, romans
Tags: dispensationalism, hermeneutics, romans
Posted in dispensationalism, hermeneutics | Comments (1)
Should Romans 5:3 καυχώμεθα εν ταίς θλίψεσιν (rejoice/exult/boast in tribulations) be limited in scope to only specific type of tribulations—as in the afflictions that come about from sufferings caused directly by the believer’s profession of Christ as Lord? Some students in the class removed tribulations that come about from sinning because of καυχώμεθα addressing the tribulations; they similarly removed tribulations that come about from natural afflictions because no one should rejoice in having their legs cut off.
I don’t think this exegetical decision is viable.
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: exegesis, greek, men's study, romans
Tags: exegesis, greek, men's study, romans
Posted in romans | Comments (8)
Tonight at the Roman’s study there was a question regarding Romans 4:15—why is it there?
The questioner was confused about the nature of violation of Law since this entire chapter doesn’t seem to be dealing with Law at all. After all, asked the student, isn’t the nature of Law to (1) prescribe and punish; and hasn’t Paul already established the (2) equality of Jew and Gentile to enter in by faith: why go back and deal with condemnation that comes about from Law breaking?
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: gospel, law, romans
Tags: gospel, law, romans
Posted in israel, romans, study | Comments (1)
For a more careful execution of this topic refer to my Romans series at The Bible Archive. My main point will be this: that the Gospel winds up being a practical help that can be used to cure any form of boasting evidenced in cynicism, pharisaicism and judgmentalism. To prove this, I’ll focus on Paul’s argumentation in Romans.
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: cynicicm, gospel, judgmentalism, romans, selfishness
Tags: cynicicm, gospel, judgmentalism, romans, selfishness
Posted in apologetics, romans | Comments (1)