I don’t like the word denominations nor do I really like the term “Plymouth-Brethren” for my (so-called) denomination. According to Scriptures the only thing I see Christians being called is Christians or brethren.
When I look out at that vast landscape of Christendom and a person calls themselves a Christian and exhibits the fruit of their profession, I call them brother or sister—so do most of the folk I assemble with. A Christian should be able to embrace all believers as being part of the Body of Christ although acknowledging that others may not be convicted of the same things.
Mind you, our individual gatherings are responsible to themselves and answer to no higher authority than God above—and we feel that it is the same with each and every Christian denomination or individual.
You believe in God? Amen, so do I. You believe in His Son? Praise the Lord, salvation is by no other. You’re fully convinced of your doctrinal stance? Amen, we are each to be fully convinced for we will give personal account to the Lord one day.
This being the case, when I give account before the Lord
will my excuses consist of a denominational report card? “Well Lord, you know, I read the Word you gave and this is how I took it and in my mind I was convinced and in my conscience I could see that I was being disobedient but I thought I would be okay because, after all, [X denomination] has [Insert Great Leader names] and [X denomination or movement or position] has been around since the [insert century here].
Indeed, in our own gathering there are folks of different persuasions and stances. Some folks have a stance that it is important to pray on our knees. Others have a distinctly Calvinist persuasion and yet others are more Arminian in their leaning if not in their doctrine. We do not divide over it.
The word of God is explicit that the reason for our calling is to give God the glory, so that we may grow in Him and glorify Him for all eternity. Therefore each Christian is to take great care with what we do before the Almighty Living God and in this world around us.
So, we wind up gathering with like-minded folk. Folk who see
the need to worship the Lord by the breaking of bread and taking the cup—often and until the Lord returns. Folk who see the plurality of elders, the multiplicity of gifts, and the financial support by only those who are in fellowship with one another. Folk who are given over to the studying and preaching of the Word and making disciples of men, with the goal being that God is glorified.
Therefore, we don’t gather under [X-Denomination] doctrine because
they’re not likeminded in our take of worship, or authority, or leadership. Not that we’re condemning them as sinners but rather, our conscience bears witness, knowing we have to personally answer to the Lord. Will I point out to a person of [X-Denomination] where I think he?s wrong? Only if he asks or if he starts condemning Christians of hell-fire if they don?t stand in line behind his persuasion. Have we broken bread with [X, Y or Z Denomination]? Of course! Have we stood firm on our convictions in those meetings as well? Oh surely.
So there you have it Brother Pseudo-Polymath, I do not
encourage division but I encourage like-minded community because in the end, we each have to give an account to the Lord.
-r-
Ref: Rom 14; 2 Cor 10; 1 Cor 10, 11; Eph 4;
HT: Jeremy
Update: Other Responses can be found on Mark’s site, but take a look at these: David, Adrian, Mike, Jeremy’s defense of unity
2 replies on “Denominations versus Divisions”
[…] They have left a church and are looking for grounds to further support the decision. Listen, I’ve dealt with this in the past but, to summarize that post, gathering with like-minded believers over a secondary matter of conviction is not necessarily a […]
Just now found your blog. I would have to ask…would you meet with catholics and/or do you consider catholics brethren?